Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

The Guide of completing Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be Online

If you take an interest in Fill and create a Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be, here are the simple steps you need to follow:

  • Hit the "Get Form" Button on this page.
  • Wait in a petient way for the upload of your Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be.
  • You can erase, text, sign or highlight as what you want.
  • Click "Download" to conserve the files.
Get Form

Download the form

A Revolutionary Tool to Edit and Create Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be

Edit or Convert Your Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be in Minutes

Get Form

Download the form

How to Easily Edit Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be Online

CocoDoc has made it easier for people to Modify their important documents on online website. They can easily Modify through their choices. To know the process of editing PDF document or application across the online platform, you need to follow the specified guideline:

  • Open the website of CocoDoc on their device's browser.
  • Hit "Edit PDF Online" button and Attach the PDF file from the device without even logging in through an account.
  • Edit your PDF online by using this toolbar.
  • Once done, they can save the document from the platform.
  • Once the document is edited using the online platform, you can download the document easily of your choice. CocoDoc provides a highly secure network environment for implementing the PDF documents.

How to Edit and Download Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be on Windows

Windows users are very common throughout the world. They have met hundreds of applications that have offered them services in managing PDF documents. However, they have always missed an important feature within these applications. CocoDoc wants to provide Windows users the ultimate experience of editing their documents across their online interface.

The process of editing a PDF document with CocoDoc is easy. You need to follow these steps.

  • Select and Install CocoDoc from your Windows Store.
  • Open the software to Select the PDF file from your Windows device and go on editing the document.
  • Modify the PDF file with the appropriate toolkit offered at CocoDoc.
  • Over completion, Hit "Download" to conserve the changes.

A Guide of Editing Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be on Mac

CocoDoc has brought an impressive solution for people who own a Mac. It has allowed them to have their documents edited quickly. Mac users can fill PDF forms with the help of the online platform provided by CocoDoc.

For understanding the process of editing document with CocoDoc, you should look across the steps presented as follows:

  • Install CocoDoc on you Mac to get started.
  • Once the tool is opened, the user can upload their PDF file from the Mac quickly.
  • Drag and Drop the file, or choose file by mouse-clicking "Choose File" button and start editing.
  • save the file on your device.

Mac users can export their resulting files in various ways. With CocoDoc, not only can it be downloaded and added to cloud storage, but it can also be shared through email.. They are provided with the opportunity of editting file through different ways without downloading any tool within their device.

A Guide of Editing Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be on G Suite

Google Workplace is a powerful platform that has connected officials of a single workplace in a unique manner. If users want to share file across the platform, they are interconnected in covering all major tasks that can be carried out within a physical workplace.

follow the steps to eidt Submitted Sample(S) Said To Be on G Suite

  • move toward Google Workspace Marketplace and Install CocoDoc add-on.
  • Upload the file and click "Open with" in Google Drive.
  • Moving forward to edit the document with the CocoDoc present in the PDF editing window.
  • When the file is edited at last, download or share it through the platform.

PDF Editor FAQ

If you are visibly disfigured or disabled and a random three-year-old loudly asks their parent(s) about you, what would you prefer the response of the parent(s) to be?

My late son, Tom, was born with numerous health problems; he was a hole in the heart baby and he also had chronic scoliosis so his spine was bent almost into an L shape which worsened as he grew older. So he was extremely short for his age, and had a hunched back, and no neck, so he was naturally self conscious about his appearance. There was no avoiding the fact that he looked ‘different'.One day my wife and I took our three kids (Tom was eight at the time, and the youngest) to a large garden centre near Stockport, England. The centre had one building dedicated to fish, so while my wife and the two other kids went buying flowers, I took Tom to view the fish tanks.As we wandered around the the dark room, which was dimly lit by the light from the tanks, I suddenly noticed Tom looking discomforted. “What's the matter?” I asked. “That boy over there,” he said miserably, “ he keeps staring at me!” I looked over, and sure enough there was a boy, a little younger than Tom, staring at him in open fascination. “I know what we can do,” I said, “let's stare back!” So I dropped to my knees besides Tom and we both stared back at the kid, who promptly flushed bright red and fled!I then explained to Tom that the little boy wasn't trying to be cruel, he was just interested because he’d probably never seen anyone who looked like him before. I said it was a perfectly natural thing for anyone to do. I told him that if he was a pop star or royalty then he'd have people staring at him all the time; “so imagine you're a star and just enjoy all the attention!” “If anyone asks why you look like you do, just tell them and they'll want to be friends,” I added.Tom took my advice go heart, and his personality just opened up; he was never bullied or teased at school because he was so funny and popular. To help boost his self image, I wrote a young adults book, a comic adventure story, based on him. I wanted my hero to have all the physical problems of Tom, and use them to to his advantage. I'm not trying to promote the book, but you can find it on Amazon or Nook and read a sample, its call ‘ Blip and the Seat of Arthur.” by Bill Henry Edge.Tom absolutely loved the book, and he himself became a writer; while he was in University he submitted a comedy script to the BBC and it was accepted just after he died suddenly, surrounded by close friends while drinking in a pub; he was just 21.I spoke to him shortly before that and he told me he loved being who he was, and that he wouldn't want to change a single thing; he just loved being different.I hope you'll forgive me adding this poem he wrote.“I found the phone number of God,Scribbled on some park bench,In a Salford garden, in falling rain.Running my fingers overScratched digits,I felt the splintered grain,A feeling I would know againwhen I rang that numberAnd no answer came.”Tom Edge.When I was in my twenties and before I was married and became a dad, I once went to a pub with some friends. It was very busy, and there was a slot machine in one corner. We were all laughing and joking, and I was very well known for my sense of humour. I suddenly looked over to the slot machine and noticed it was being used by a young man with a distinct hump on his back; “Have you noticed” I said to my friends, pointing to the young hunchback, “that he wins every time a bell comes up?” Everybody roared with laughter, but I felt mean and wished I hadn't said anything.I never lost that feeling of guilt for mocking that young lad, and that was compounded when little Tom was born several years later, and I had a hunchback of my very own. I know now, that if someone had mocked Tom just as I had with that unknown boy I would have been furious! It shames me to this day.

What is the funniest joke you've ever heard or read?

A few maintenance complaints and problems as submitted by Qantas’ pilots and the solution recorded by maintenance engineers.(P = Problem logged by the pilot.)(S = Solution and action taken by the engineers.)P: Left inside main tire almost needs replacement.S: Almost replaced left inside main tire.P: Test flight OK, except auto-land very rough.S: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft.P: Something loose in cockpit.S: Something tightened in cockpit.P: Dead bugs on windshield.S: Live bugs on back-order.P: Autopilot in altitude-hold mode produces a 200 feet per minute descent.S: Cannot reproduce problem on ground.P: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear.S: Evidence removed.P: DME volume unbelievably loud.S: DME volume set to more believable level.P: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick.S: That’s what they’re there for.P: IFF inoperative.S: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode.P: Suspected crack in windshield.S: Suspect you’re right.P: Number 3 engine missing.S: Engine found on right wing after brief search.P: Aircraft handles funny.S: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right, and be serious.P: Target radar hums.S: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics.P: Mouse in cockpit.S: Cat installed.P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.S: Took hammer away from midget.HOW DO COURT RECORDERS KEEP STRAIGHT FACES!!These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and published by court reporters that had the torment of staying calm while the exchanges were taking place.Attorney: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?Witness: He said, 'Where am I, Cathy?'Attorney: And why did that upset you?Witness: My name is Susan!_______________________________Attorney: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?Witness: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.____________________________________________Attorney: What is your date of birth?Witness: July 18th.Attorney: Which year?Witness: Every year._____________________________________Attorney: How old is your son, the one living with you?Witness: Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can't remember which.Attorney: How long has he lived with you?Witness: Forty-five years._________________________________Attorney: Are you sexually active?Witness: No, I just lie there.____________________________________________Attorney: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?Witness: Yes.Attorney: And in what ways does it affect your memory?Witness: I forget..Attorney: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?___________________________________________Attorney: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?Witness: Did you actually pass the bar exam?____________________________________Attorney: The youngest son, the 20-year-old, how old is he?Witness: He's 20, much like your IQ.___________________________________________Attorney: Were you present when your picture was taken?Witness: Are you shitting me?_________________________________________Attorney: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?Witness: Yes.Attorney: And what were you doing at that time?Witness: Getting laid____________________________________________Attorney: She had three children, right?Witness: Yes.Attorney: How many were boys?Witness: None.Attorney: Were there any girls?Witness: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?____________________________________________Attorney: How was your first marriage terminated?Witness: By death..Attorney: And by whose death was it terminated?Witness: Take a guess.___________________________________________Attorney: Can you describe the individual?Witness: He was about medium height and had a beardAttorney: Was this a male or a female?Witness: Unless the Circus was in town I'm going with male._____________________________________Attorney: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?Witness: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.______________________________________Attorney: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?Witness: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight._________________________________________Attorney: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?Witness: Oral..._________________________________________Attorney: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?Witness: The autopsy started around 8:30 PMAttorney: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?Witness: If not, he was by the time I finished.____________________________________________Attorney: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?Witness: Are you qualified to ask that question?______________________________________Attorney: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?Witness: No.Attorney: Did you check for blood pressure?Witness: No.Attorney: Did you check for breathing?Witness: No.Attorney: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?Witness: No.Attorney: How can you be so sure, Doctor?Witness: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.Attorney: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?Witness: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

Are Ramayan and Mahabharata real?

[Through this answer,i wish to change the perception of all the people who consider Mahabharata and Ramayana as Mythology]This answer is going to be long.References from many books,many researches.(So,if you can not read this whole answer.Then,i must tell you that the researches have proven that Mahabharata and Ramayana really happened.I am just going to talk about that.And,will prove it as our glorious past,not as Mythology!)Let’s start with Mahabharata!Mahabharata without Dvaraka is not imaginable.So,let’s find Dvaraka:-THE LOST CITY OF DWARAKA:-•The discovery of the legendary city of Dvaraka which is said to have been founded by Sri Krishna, is an important landmark in the validation of historical relevance of Mahabharata. It has set at rest the doubts expressed by historians about the historicity of Mahabharata and the very existence of Dvaraka city. It has greatly narrowed the gap of Indian history by establishing the continuity of the Indian civilization from the Vedic age to the present day. The discovery has also shed welcome light on second urbanization in the so-called 'Dark age', on the resuscitation of dharma, on the resumption of maritime trade, and use of Sanskrit language and modified Indus script. Incidentally, scientific data useful for a study of sea level changes and effects of marine environment on metals and wood over long periods has also been generated by underwater exploration. All this was possible because of the dedicated and daring efforts of marine archaeologists, scientists and technicians of the Marine Archaeology Centre of the National Institute of Oceanography.Dvaraka Exploration:-•Dwaraka is a coastal town in Jamnagar district of Gujarat. Traditionally, modern Dwaraka is identified with Dvaraka, mentioned in the Mahabharata as Krishna's city. Dwaraka was a port, and some scholars have identified it with the island of Barka mentioned in the Periplus of Erythrean Sea. Ancient Dwaraka sank in sea and hence is an important archaeological site. The first clear historical record of the lost city is dated 574 A.D. and occurs in the Palitana Plates of Samanta Simhaditya. This inscription refers to Dwaraka as the capital of the western coast of Saurashtra and still more important, states that Sri Krishna lived here.The first archaeological excavations at Dwaraka were done by the Deccan College, Pune and the Department of Archaeology, Government of Gujarat, in 1963 under the direction of H.D. Sankalia. It revealed artefacts many centuries old.The Marine Archaeological Unit (MAU) of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) conducted a second round of excavations in 1979 under the supervision of Dr S. R. Rao (one of the most respected archaeologists of India). An emeritus scientist at the marine archaeology unit of the National Institute of Oceanography, Rao has excavated a large number of Harappan sites including the port city of Lothal in Gujarat. He found a distinct pottery known as lustrous red ware, which could be more than 3,000 years old. Based on the results of these excavations, the search for the sunken city in the Arabian Sea began in 1981. Scientists and archaeologists have continually worked on the site for 20 years.The project for underwater exploration was sanctioned in 1984, directly by the then Prime Minister for three years. Excavation under the sea is a hard and strenuous task. The sea offers too much resistance. Excavation is possible only between November and February, during low tide. The sea has to be smooth and there should be bright sunshine. All these requirements effectively reduce the number of diving days to 40 to 45 in one season.In order to make the maximum use of the time available, divers use echo sounder to get a fairly accurate idea of the location and the depth of the object under water. The side scan sonar offers a view of the sea floor. The sonar signals sent inside the water return the signals. Reading of the signals reveals the broad nature of the object under water. Underwater scooters, besides the usual diving equipment like scuba were also pressed into service. Between 1983 and 1990, S.R.Rao's team came across discoveries that cemented the existance of a submerged city.In January 2007, the Underwater Archaeology Wing (UAW) of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) began excavations at Dwaraka again. Alok Tripathi, Superintending Archaeologist, UAW, said the ancient underwater structures found in the Arabian Sea were yet to be identified. "We have to find out what they are. They are fragments. I would not like to call them a wall or a temple. They are part of some structure," said Dr. Tripathi, himself a trained diver. Dr. Tripathi had said: "To study the antiquity of the site in a holistic manner, excavations are being conducted simultaneously both on land [close to the Dwarakadhish temple] and undersea so that finds from both the places can be co-related and analysed scientifically."The objective of the excavation was to know the antiquity of the site, based on material evidence. In the offshore excavation, the ASI's trained underwater archaeologists and the divers of the Navy searched the sunken structural remains. The finds were studied, dated and documented. On land, the excavation was done in the forecourt of the Dwarakadhish temple. Students from Gwalior, Lucknow, Pune, Vadodara,Varanasi and Bikaner joined in to help the ASI archaeologists.GULF OF KHAMBAT EXPLORATION(GULF OF CAMBAY)• In 2001, the students of National Institute of Oceanography were commissioned by the Indian Government to do a survey on pollution in Gulf of Khambat, seven miles from the shore. During the survey, they found buildings made of stones covered in mud and sand covering five square miles. Divers have collected blocks, samples, artefacts, and coppers coins, which scientists believe is the evidence from an age that is about 3,600 years old. Some of the samples were sent to Manipur and oxford university for carbon dating, and the results created more suspicion since some of the objects were found to be 9000 years old.It is indeed overwhelming to find that what had been discovered underwater at the bay of Cambat is an archaeological site, dating back to 7500 BC and older than any previously claimed oldest sites of civilization.Findings at the Dwaraka Excavation site:-•Marine archaeological explorations off Dwarka have brought to light a large number of stone structures. They are are semicircular, rectangular and square in shape and are in water depth ranging from inter tidal zone to 6 m. They are randomly scattered over a vast area. Besides these structures, a large number of varieties of stone anchors have been noticed along the structures as well as beyond 6 m water depth.These findings suggest that Dwarka was one of the most busy port centers during the past on the west coast of India. The comparative study of surrounding sites indicates that the date of the structures of Dwarka may be between Historical period and late medieval period.The ruins have been proclaimed the remains of the legendary lost city of Dwarka which, according to ancient Hindu texts, was the dwelling place of Krishna.The underwater excavations revealed structures and ridge-like features. Other antiquities were also found. All the objects were photographed and documented with drawings - both underwater. While underwater cameras are used for photography, drawings are done on boards - a transparent polyester film of 75 micron fixed with a graph sheet below. The graph sheet acts as a scale. One or two divers take the dimensions and the third draws the pictures. The Public Works Department routinely conducts dredging in these waters to keep the Gomati channel open. This throws up a lot of sediments, which settle on underwater structures. Brushes are used to clear these sediments to expose the structures.* Explorations yielded structures such as bastions, walls, pillars and triangular and rectangular stone anchors.* A semi-spherical single-hole stone which might be the base for flagpost.* L-shaped edges of stones for proper grip and arresting wave action on bastions.* Seals, inscriptions, which have been dated to 1500 BC.* Pottery, which have been dated to 3528 BC.* Stone sculptures, terracotta beads, bronze, copper and iron objects.Until recently the very existence of the city of Dwarka was a matter of legends. Now, that the remains have been discovered under water, and with many clues seeming to suggest that this, indeed, is the legendary Dwarka, dwelling place of lord Krishna, could it be that lord Krishna and his heroics were more than just a legend?Findings at the Gulf of Khambat Excavation site:-•On the other hand explorations conducted in the Gulf of Cambay waters revealed sandstone walls, a grid of streets and some evidence of a sea port 70 feet under water, and artefacts dating back to 7500BC. Among the artifacts recovered were a piece of wood, pottery sherds, weathered stones initially described as hand tools, fossilized bones, and a tooth. Artifacts were sent to the National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) in Hyderabad, India, the Birbal Sahni Institute of Paleobotany (BSIP) in Lucknow, India, and the Physical Research Laboratory in Ahmedabad, India. The piece of wood was carbon dated to an age of 9,500 years old.NIOT returned for further investigation in the Gulf from October 2002 to January 2003. During these excavations, NIOT reported finding two paleochannels flanked by rectangular and square basement-like features. Artifacts were recovered by means of dredging, including pottery sherds, microliths, wattle and daub remains, and hearth materials. These artifacts were sent for dating at the laboratories of Manipur University and Oxford University and were concluded to be 9000 years oldMainstream scientists maintain that ancient Indian culture/civilization goes back some 4-5 thousand years. Yet the ruins below the Gulf of Cambay go back at least 9 thousand years proving that the ancient indian civilization is much older than originally believed.Correlation of Dwarka Excavation site with the Dwarka of Mahabharata:-A few years ago, when asked as to how sure he was that this was Krishna's Dwarka, Rao had replied, "only the name board is missing." He submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Culture in January 2000, that aimed at preserving the 'underwater cultural heritage of India Dwarka' and also promoting it as a pilgrimage-tourism center. His proposal, in three stages, was to cost Rs 14 crores. It is sad that the proposal was not taken up. The then Secretary, Ministry of Culture, visited Dwarka and promised help, but nothing has been heard so far.In the project proposal, Rao writes, "The fort walls of the first town of Dwarka said to have been founded at Kusasthali in Bet Dwarka island have been traced on shore and in the sea and also dated by thermoluminescence dating method to 16th century BC." According to him, the clue to the existence of ancient Dwarka near the modern town of Dwarka was found during archaeological excavation near the Dwarkadhish temple in 1979-80. Eroded debris and pottery provided evidence of a port town destroyed by sea about 3,500 years ago. This evidence is what led to the early excavations in the Arabian Sea, near the mouth of the Gomati river, where the modern town of Dwarka stands.The Indian text is replete with accounts of how the original Dwarka looked like. Mahabharat says that Dwarka had 900,000 royal palaces, all constructed with crystal and silver and decorated with emeralds. The city was connected by an elaborate system of boulevards, roads, market places, assembly houses and temples. These legends have been etched into the Indian minds for so long that their authenticity is not questioned. Fortunately, due to the grace of the marine archaeological department of India, the childhood stories have come to be a reality to a great extent.Marine archaeological explorations have thrown light on a number of structures of different shapes, stone anchors and other artefacts. The exploration has found sandstone walls, a grid of streets and remains of a sea port, some 70 feet beneath the sea. The evidence points to the fact of the existence of a city some 9,000 years ago. Also according to them this was one of the most important and busy ports during historical and medieval periods.The detailed exploration and excavation of this sunken city was started in 1988 with certain goals and results in mind:1. The explorations were extended up to the Temple of Samudranarayan (Sea God), in order to trace the extent of the port city and the purpose behind the massive stone walls built on the banks of the ancient Gomati River.2. Whether the architectural features were in conformity to the ones described in the Mahabharat.3. To obtain a more corroborative evidence for reclamation referred to in the epic.4. The nick point where the Gomati River joined the sea had to be determined.5. The cause of the submergenceDwarka was supposed to have been built on six blocks, two on the right bank and four on the left. All the six sectors have protective walls built of dressed stones of sandstones. Whatever has been traced so far conforms to the description of Dwarka in the Mahabharat to a large extent. For example, the enclosures may correspond to the Antahpurs (harems) of the texts.Similarly, the large number of stone anchors is indicative of overseas trade. The large ships were anchored to the sea, whereas the small ones were near to the warehouses on the Gomati, part of which has been submerged.The layout of the excavated city, the spread and the location of fort walls and bastions match the descriptions mentioned in Harivamsha, a prologue to Mahabharata. Harivamsha described the city of Dwarka in minute details. According to it, the area of Dwarka was 12 yojanas. It was connected to the mainland by a strip, which is visible even now, in low tide. The city excavated is of the same size.Harivamsha, detailing the security arrangements, says that there were seals, without which one could not enter the city. Seals of a particular description were found on the seabed. A stone image of Vishnu, chert blades and pottery are all part of the recovered objects. Certain coins were found during excavations underwater having inscriptions similar to details found in Mahabharata.Elaborating on the town plan of first Dwarka, Rao's proposal says, "There were two fortification walls. One in the lower terrace and another in the middle terrace. The walls which extended over a length of 4 km on the eastern shore are mostly destroyed by sea action. The walls of the lower terrace are of massive, dressed sandstone blocks while that of the upper terrace are of rubble. The houses and other public buildings, built of smaller size stones within the enclosure are all destroyed and levelled up by the encroachment of the sea. These structures lie in a depth of 7 to 10 meters, below the present mean sea-level, indicating a rise of 10 meters in sea-level during the last 3,600 years." The reclamation of land from water-logged areas, referred to in Mahabharata, in order to build the city, is also attested by the boulder foundations over which walls and bastions were raised.Marine archaeology has proved that the existence of the Dwarka and its submergence in the second millennium B.C referred to in the Mahabharat, Harivamsa, Matsya and Vayu Purans (Sanskrit texts) is a fact and not fiction. The implications of accepting the archeologists’ finds as proof that the sunken city is indeed the legendary Dwarka would be very significant for the understanding of what the Mahabharata is. It would no longer be merely a book of myths and legends, but in fact, at least to some extent, a genuine account of past events.Speculations and Conclusions:-Based on the correlation between the excavated structures and artefacts with the description of Dwarka in Harivamsha purana, and the fact that the carbon dating of artefacts fall around 3500BC, the same period concluded by many astronomical analysts as the period of the Mahabharata war and the submersion of Dwarka, it is more than reasonable to conclude that the excavated site near Bet Dwarka is indeed the legandary city of Dwarka.The discovery of the second exploration at Gulf of Khambat proves that it was not just Dwarka that got submersed, but more costal regions got encroached by the sea over centuries, and the dating of artefacts to 7500BC indicates that the ancient indian civilization is more than 9000 years old, and the entire coastal regions has been going under sea from 9000BC, and this phenomenon took over the city of Dwarka by around 3500BC.Before the discovery of the legendary city of Dwaraka, some scholars were of view that the Hindu Epic Mahabharata is only a myth and that it would be futile to search for the remains of the ancient city and that too in the sea. Few scholars also believe that the Mahabharata battle was a family feud which was exaggerated into a war. Excavations of Dr S. R. Rao at Dwaraka prove that the descriptions found in the texts are not to be discarded as fancy stories but are to be treated as based on logic and reasoning.Thus the results have proved that the account in Mahabharata as to the existence of a beautiful capital city of Dwaraka of Sri Krishna was not a mere figment of imagination but it did exist.What really happened to Dwaraka:-The rise in the sea-level in Dwarka is a scientific truth. Studies have proved that the sea considerably and suddenly rose to submerge the city. Harivamsha describes the submerging of Dwarka saying Krishna instructed Arjuna, who was then visiting Dwarka, to evacuate the residents of the city as the sea was going to engulf the city. "On the seventh day (of Krishna saying this), as the last of the citizens were leaving the city, the sea entered the streets of Dwarka."According to experts, there could have been three reasons why the sea entered the land. One, a change in the level of seabed, two, a massive earthquake and three, sudden increase in the level of sea water. Of the three, the last is the most plausible. If it was a change in the level of seabed, some remains of the "tearing off action" on the shore would be visible, which is absent. Earthquake can be ruled out as the structures have not collapsed because of the shake. The third reason is most acceptable as a similar phenomenon had occurred in the shores of Bahrain, around the same time, as some recent findings indicate.It is to be noted here that considerable work has been done on shore and offshore underwater excavations in Bahrain, which has indicated a deep and regular trade and other relations between the western coast and the coasts of the present-day Bahrain .•But the work on further excavation has met a formidable roadblock in the form of academic indifference and government apathy. A proposal submitted to the government by Dr S.R. Rao, renowned marine archaeologist, who led the underwater investigations is collecting dust for over four years now.It is clear that for almost a decade the Central Government had not shown much interest in the excavations in Dwarka or the one at Gulf of Cambay. Though the discoveries at Gulf of Cambay by the National Institute of Ocean Technology established carbon-14 date of 7,500 to 9,000 years for the wood samples excavated from under the sea and the existence of a civilization dating to that period, it might not be directly connected with Krishna's Dwarka which Shri Rao believes existed some 4,000 years ago. This, however, might help in ascertaining the rise in the sea-level about 30 meters in 7,500 years, approximately at the rate of 10 meters in 3,500-3,800 years. Dr Rao is on record that Dwarka excavation was carried out almost fully but the excavation in the inter-tidal zone of Balapur Bay in Bet Dwarka where further antiquities may be found, has not been carried out partly due to the lack of funds and mainly due to lack of interest in the CSIR.Dwarka, as of today is still one of the best-studied underwater sites in India.S.R RAO’S PROPOSALS:-The proposal envisaged a three-stage heritage conservation. This was to be done along with further excavations in Bet Dwarka. It was suggested that access to the submerged city in Dwarka water can be given to visitors, in fair season, through underwater acrylic tubes or viewing chambers at specific points. Such facilities exist in Singapore and Auckland (New Zealand). Alternatively, underwater video cameras can be used to project images above water, in monitors.The project also mooted the idea of a submarine museum of dolphins as they are in good population in deeper water, off Dwarka. There is also a strong case for a Maritime Museum of Antiquities found in excavations at Dwarka, Bet Dwarka, Somnath, Nageswar and dioramas of Lothal port and Dwarka city. As of now, the Dwarka antiquities are lying in NIO, Goa.It is again a telling story of the system in India, which is the cause of lack of interest in the project. Such a discovery in any other country would have been approved and encouraged. The excavation on Dwarka was done by Rao, who was with the National Institute of Oceanography, Goa. Though work remained to be done, the CSIR, under whom falls the NIO, did not release the funds. Further extension to Rao was not given as he had already reached the age of 72.It is indeed surprising that the history associations, archaeologists and historians have taken little notice of the findings at Dwarka. In its early days, the project received UNESCO support and several foreign marine archaeologists also offered help. However, the government's indifference to the project has kept them away. Unlike several other land excavations, the underwater excavations can be done only with total government help. Several levels of permissions are needed. While land excavations are demanding in labor, the underwater explorations need machinery and equipment. Skillful divers, who are trained to look for meaningful objects are required too.For an Indian, Dwarka is not a mere archaeological site, nor is it a proof. Indians have all along believed Mahabharata to be a historical narration. But the excavations are a national heritage, a symbol of pride, an honor that is shared by all who are born in this land of Bharata. It is a call for action on Dwarka.Reference:Dwarka to Kurushetra. Dr. S. R. Rao. Journal of Marine Archaeology (1995-96).Underwater Cultural Heritage. A.S Gaur and K. H Vora. Current Science Volume 86 No 9 May 2004.Further Excavations of the Submerged City of Dwarka. S. R. Rao. Recent Advances in Marine ArchaeologyNews Articles (Hindu, Deccan Herald, Reuters)The Underwater Ruins of Dwarka (Research Article) | Rafal ReyzerDo you want to learn the legends of the underwater ruins of Dwarka (or Dvaraka) in the state of Gujarat? Here you'll find the latest archaeological findings.http://rafalreyzer.com/the-underwater-ruins-of-dwarka/Real site:-The Lost City of DwarkaA short review of the astronomical, literary and archaeological evidences that point to the historicity and dating of Mahabharata, and a quick introduction to the evolution of the epichttp://mahabharata-research.com/about%20the%20epic/the%20lost%20city%20of%20dwarka.html{Yes,i copied all the research word by word written in the site.The site is trusted cause i have read 2 books and the site of the references given.I copied word/word and did’nt give the link directly because people do not like to go to another site to have a look,so my answer would have been wasted.So,i decided to paste word/word from the site.Once again saying i have read the 2 out of the 3 mentioned books by ASI}There are many other proofs of the happening of Mahabharata.But,this one was the best!Now,coming to Ramayana:-1)COBRA HOOD CAVE,SRI LANKA:-•This cave is in Sri Lanka tested and proven by Archaeologists to be Natural.According to legends,this is where mother Sita was held captive by the Asuras.There are cave paintings at this particular place depicting the same.The paintings here are of pre-Christian era which makes the argument more strong.It’s shape is that like of a giant cobra and so is the name.2)The famous Shri Ram Sethu.The image released by NASA confirmed the presence of the bridge between the two countries(India and Sri Lanka) and added to it, the bridge’s angled curvature and composition that has stood against the test of nature proves that it is indeed man-made.Most probably(not all sure) this is that image:-(Information is all true.But,not sure about the above image.)3)Ashok Vatika, Sri LankaAshok Vatika, is said to be the haven where Ravana kept Goddess Sita as a prisoner. This garden stands the same even today. This is presently referred to as the, Hakgala Botanical Garden and stands close to the city of Nuwara Eliya, Sri Lanka.4)HANUMAN GARHI:-Located in Ayodhya right at the centre.Legends state that this is the place where Shri Ram’s greatest devotee ever Shri Hanuman waited for him.‘Hanuman Garhi is actually a cave temple that is approachable by a flight of 76 steps. The manner in which this temple has been carved out is mesmerizing. One has to take the curved flight of stairs to reach this spot that is said to be once inhabited by Lord Hanuman. Lord Hanuman was the escort and guard of Lord Rama during and after his campaign against Lanka. If one goes by the legend, Hanuman lived in this cave and guarded the Janambhoomi or Ramkot. The sanctum contains the statue of Mata Anjani holding infant Hanuman on her lap. The statue itself is unimpressive and one has to struggle in dark while figuring out the statue. The faithful believe that all their wishes are granted with a visit to this holy shrine’5)Sita Eliya, Sri Lanka.The stream in which Mother Sita bathed,is same even today.Reffered to as Sita Eliya or Sita Jharna6)Konda Kattu Gala, Ishtreepura.Mother Sita is said to have taken bath in the very stream and sat on a rock drying her hair owing to which the place got its name Konda Kattu Gala. This place is located even now, in Welimada Area, Sri Lanka.Legend states that, Ravana moved Sita to Ishtreepura after her abduction. This was an only women area as he was concerned about her place of imprisonment post the sudden arrival of Lord Hanuman as a messenger of peace from Lord Rama.The pond is said to have formed due to Mother Sita’s tears and exists even today.This location is buzzed to be an ingenious work of art and architecture for it is connected by numerous tunnels and paths to all areas of Ravana’s city.7) Lepakshi, Andhra Pradesh.When Ravana abducted Mother Sita, Jatayu ji tried his best to prevent it from happening .Jatayu, is said to be a demi-god in vulture form and the place where he fought Raavan is -Lepakshi, Andhra Pradesh which exists the same as a temple even today.8) Hot-wells of Kanniya.It is mentioned in Ramayana that Ravana built hot wells in Kanniya as well as in many Sri Lankan temples.Which exists even today.9)Sita Kotuwa,Sri Lanka:-Legend states that, Ravana brought Sita first to Sita Kotuwa in Sri Lanka. The same exists even now as a tourist spot in this country.10)Ashokavanam,Sri Lanka:-Ravana is said to have later moved Sita to a beautiful forest which is referred to by the name of Ashokavatika in Valmiki’s text. This beautiful expanse of a forest exists even now in Sri Lanka and is referred presently by the name- Ashokavanam.Further,there are many other proofs such as the state of flora and fauna in the paths mentioned in Ramayana.And,Lord Hanuman’s footprints(in many places).According to most of the people they are Lord Hanuman’s footprints.I have no information about any research on these footprints.So,it is not a reliable information according to me.But,the above mentioned points and the state of flora and fauna are sufficient to prove that Ramayana happened.Cause no one can write any imaginary text with such detail.Moreover,the geography tells everything.(Source of above images:-GOOGLE.)So,my last wish is that please spread this answer to let the people know that RAMAYANA AND MAHABHARATA ARE NOT MYTHOLOGY BUT THE GLORIOUS HISTORY OF OUR BHARAT.यत् भावो-तत् भवति(You become what you believe)

Why Do Our Customer Upload Us

Easy to Use Lets me travel the world and still go to work Low cost The ability to be the administrator over my employees The template capabilities are awesome

Justin Miller